Judge Judith Sheindlin, famously known as Judge Judy, recently voiced her concerns about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of Donald Trump. In a candid CNN interview, she criticized Bragg for focusing on Trump while crime rates in New York City surge, posing the question: Should political motives outweigh public safety priorities?
Critique of Prosecutorial Priorities
Judge Judy’s evaluation of Bragg centers on what she perceives as a misallocation of resources. She questioned Bragg’s prosecution of Trump related to Stormy Daniels payments, labeling the case politically motivated and unnecessary. During her interview, she said, “You had to twist yourself into a pretzel to figure out what the crime was,” and accused Bragg of not liking Trump, reflecting sentiments held by some New Yorkers.
WATCH: Judge Judy Calls Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's Case Against Trump Nonsense, Says He is Prosecuting Trump for 'Personal Self-Aggrandizement'
Judge Judy Sheindlin, best known for her small claims court reality TV show and no-BS attitude, shared her thoughts on Manhattan DA…— MeeksAZ 🇺🇸 (@MeeksAZ) June 22, 2024
Sheindlin argued that addressing Manhattan’s crime should be the DA’s priority. Owning property in Manhattan, she expressed a personal stake in Bragg’s focus. She stated, “I would be happier…if the district attorney…would take care of criminals…than to spend $5 million or $10 million of taxpayers’ money trying Donald Trump on this nonsense.” As Bragg faces re-election, her critique resonates with voters cautious about crime and DA priorities.
Impact on Bragg’s Re-election Bid
While Bragg’s pursuit of Trump ended in a conviction in January 2025 without punishment, his re-election campaign is bolstered by increased fundraising since early 2025. Despite criticism, this fundraising surge indicates potential support, yet Judge Judy’s remarks reflect dissatisfaction among some citizens concerning his prosecutorial choices. The challenge lies in whether voters prioritize Bragg’s stance against Trump or demand more attention to local crime issues.
Judge Judy: “As a person who owns property in Manhattan I would be happier if Alvin Bragg took care of criminals who make it impossible to ride the subway or walk the streets, than spending $10 million of taxpayer money trying Donald Trump on nonsense.” pic.twitter.com/YBD2uBEub8
— Bad Hombre (@joma_gc) June 21, 2024
“That’s my view. But I, as a taxpayer in this country, resent using the system for your own personal self-aggrandizement,” Sheindlin stated. Her opinions may sway the electorate as they consider Bragg’s focus and effectiveness against rising crime in their neighborhoods.
A Broader Political Landscape
Bragg’s case against Trump forms part of a larger Democratic effort to prevent Trump’s return to the White House. With ongoing cases in Georgia and at the federal level, Judge Judy’s critical perspective insists on evaluating the motivations behind these prosecutions. She suggests that allocation of legal resources should reflect public safety rather than partisan objectives.
As election time approaches, her critique invites Manhattan residents to assess Bragg’s leadership and decide if his prosecution strategies align with their expectations for safety and justice in the city.
Sources:
https://www.westernjournal.com/flashback-time-judge-judy-crushed-alvin-bragg-cnn-whole-world-see/