Families Urge Senate to Confirm Tulsi Gabbard as DNI for National Security

Citing reservations about Tulsi Gabbard’s background and divisive remarks, former national security officials advise against appointing her as director of national intelligence. However, families impacted by terrorism advocate for the swift confirmation of Tulsi Gabbard as director of national intelligence amidst rising opposition.

Families Voice a Call for Action

In the wake of devastating hostage situations, impacted families urge the Senate to confirm Tulsi Gabbard as the director of national intelligence. They believe her leadership is crucial for future prevention. With recent terrorist threats from the Islamic State, they assert Gabbard’s policy development in intelligence is essential for enhanced national security. Families trust her to prioritize effective strategies to safeguard American citizens from terrorism.

Victims Of Syrian Terror Groups Throw Support Behind @TulsiGabbard For DNI

“American hostage families know that Tulsi Gabbard has always been on our side.” https://t.co/Kzb0DIONRg
— Jason Miller (@JasonMiller) January 7, 2025

Despite public support, nearly 100 former national security officials have reservations about Gabbard’s nomination. In a letter, the officials requested a closed session to evaluate her suitability and lack of executive experience. They highlighted her controversial comments and questioned meetings with figures like Bashar al-Assad. There are concerns that her views could counter-intelligence community consensus, raising doubts about unbiased intelligence delivery.

If Tulsi Gabbard is confirmed as DNI hundreds of brave U.S. intelligence agents will be killed, and their blood will be on the hands of every Senator who voted for her. https://t.co/gmEgabkyEV
— Robert Zubrin (@robert_zubrin) December 7, 2024

Concerns and Counterclaims

Critics scrutinize Gabbard’s controversial meetings and statements, indicating she might undermine intelligence efforts. Specifically, officials note her past meetings with Assad and sympathetic comments toward leaders like Putin. Gabbard’s criticized past includes her trip to Syria and remarks on chemical attack intelligence reports. Concerns extend to her views on Russia’s Ukraine invasion, indicating potentially complicating alliances.

Trump’s transition team has criticized the letter, defending Gabbard’s nomination as a smear campaign. Despite concerns, figures like Sen. Mike Lee have defended Gabbard, citing her military service and strong stance against unwarranted military engagements. They argue that her service offers a unique perspective that is critical for the role of national intelligence.

The Path Forward

Gabbard’s nomination continues to polarize opinions in the Senate. While families and certain senators call for her swift confirmation, others demand thorough scrutiny of her capabilities and stance. The debate reflects broader concerns about maintaining national security while ensuring intelligence reports’ integrity and reliability amid external perceptions.

As the Senate weighs the decision, the outcome could significantly influence U.S. intelligence operations and strategic international alignments. In a period marked by global threats, leadership in national intelligence is crucial, and the Senate’s decision remains pivotal.